Contracting for Innovation under Ambiguity

نویسندگان

  • Massimiliano Amarante
  • Mario Ghossoub
  • Edmund S. Phelps
چکیده

At any given point in time, the collection of assets that exist in the economy is observable. Each asset is a function of a set of contingencies. The union taken over all assets of these contingencies is what we call the set of publicly known states. An innovation is a set of states that are not publicly known along with an asset (in a broad sense) that pays contingent on those states. The creator of an innovation is an entrepreneur. He is represented by a probability measure on the set of new states. All other agents perceive the innovation as ambiguous: each of them is represented by a set of probabilities on the new states. The agents in the economy are classi…ed with respect to their attitude toward the Ambiguity: the …nanciers are (locally) ambiguity seeking while the consumers are ambiguity averse. An entrepreneur and a …nancier come together when the former seeks funds to implement his project and the latter seeks new pro…t opportunities. The resulting contracting problem does not fall within the standard theory due to the presence of Ambiguity (on the …nancier's side) and to the heterogeneity in the parties'beliefs. We prove existence and monotonicity (i.e., truthful revelation) of the optimal contract. We characterize this contract under the additional assumption that the …nanciers are globally ambiguity seeking. Finally, we re-formulate our results in an insurance framework and extend the classical result of Arrow-Borch-Raviv and the more recent one of Ghossoub. In the case of an Ambiguity averse insurer, we also show that the optimal contract has the form of a generalized deductible. We are very grateful to Sujoy Mukerji, Onur Özgür and Marcus Pivato for conversations and useful suggestions.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Optimisation of Healthcare Contracts: Tensions Between Standardisation and Innovation; Comment on “Competition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?”

An important determinant of health system performance is contracting. Providers often respond to financial incentives, despite the ethical underpinnings of medicine, and payers can craft contracts to influence performance. Yet contracting is highly imperfect in both single-payer and multi-payer health systems. Arguably, in a competitive, multi-payer environment, contractual innovation may occur...

متن کامل

Tolerance of Ambiguity and Entrepreneurial Innovation

We build a general equilibrium model of occupation choice, where the risks inherent in a technology embodying a new innovation are only vaguely known (ambiguous), whereas the old technology has known risks. Using the Arrow-Hurwicz criterion to characterise decisionmaking in the face of ambiguity, we distinguish agents according to their degree of ambiguity aversion. Equilibrium requires that al...

متن کامل

Air Force Small Business Innovation Research Proposal Preparation Instructions

The Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is responsible for the implementation and management of the Air Force SBIR Program. The Air Force SBIR Program Manager is Mr. Steve Guilfoos, 1-800-222-0336. Do not submit SBIR proposals to the AF SBIR Program Manager under any circumstances. All questions concerning proposal submissions, Fast Track applications and requi...

متن کامل

Discretionary Latitude and Relational Contracting

Discretionary Latitude and Relational Contracting We use economic experiments to examine the nature of relational trading under a menu of incomplete contracts ranging from the repeat purchase mechanism of Klein and Leffler (1981) to highly incomplete contracts that are completely unenforceable by third-parties. Our results suggest that, with barriers to complete contracting, increasing the degr...

متن کامل

A Matter of Interpretation: Bargaining over Ambiguous Contracts

We present a formal treatment of contracting in the face of ambiguity. The central idea is that boundedly rational individuals will not always interpret the same situation in the same way. More speci cally, even with well de ned contracts, the precise actions to be taken by each party to the contract might be disputable. Taking this potential for dispute into account, we analyze the e ects of a...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012